“ONLY THE PEOPLE” CAN SAVE AMERICA WILL YOU? THEN REGISTER WITH THE “NATIONAL REGISTRY” At www.NationalLibertyAlliance.org to become a common law Jurist. We are establishing Common Law Grand Juries in all 3,141 counties in the United States of America. By doing this the people will move our Courts back to “Courts of Justice” and take 100% control of our government. Watch the video “Power of the Grand Jury.” THE DUTY OF THE “COMMON LAW GRAND JURY is to right any wrong. If anyone’s unalienable rights have been violated, or removed, without a legal sentence of their peers, the Grand Jury can restore them. In addition, if a dispute shall arise concerning this matter it shall be settled according to the judgment of the Grand Jurors, the Sureties of the peace. IN A US SUPREME COURT STUNNING 6 TO 3 DECISION JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, writing for the majority, confirmed that the American grand jury is neither part of the judicial, executive nor legislative branches of governme Read more

We, the Jury is the dramatic story of the seven jurors who convicted Scott Peterson of murdering his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner, despite a series of internal battles that brought the first major murder trial of the 21st century to the brink of a mistrial. The Peterson jurors argued and disagreed but eventually bonded to seal the fate of the icy killer who dumped his victims into the bullet-gray waters of San Francisco Bay. The seven jurors of We, the Jury were seven average Americans who never imagined the horrors they would face or the phantoms that would haunt them after they convicted the enigmatic murderer and recommended that he be put to death.This is the story of how the American jury system worked after being battered by critics for the way it functioned in the trials of O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson. Unlike the jurors in those trials, who second guessed themselves, the Peterson jurors do not question their decisions. It wasn't one thing that condemned Scott Peterson; it was everything. Read more

Two outstanding Texas trial lawyers - one now an equally respected district judge - have written On the Jury Trial, a “must-have” reference for any trial lawyer aspiring to excellence or seeking to maintain it. Topics include voir dire, opening statement, preparing witnesses, cross examination, using exhibits, closing argument, jury research, and more, with excellent examples and “dos and don’ts” provided throughout. Think of this audiobook as the senior law partner’s memo to associates on how to really try a case.Looking for fly-on-the-wall insight into world-class trial preparation and strategy? Here it is. A behind-the-scenes tour of the inner workings of the judicial process? This audiobook has you covered. Its combination of advice, illustration, and commentary is every bit as valuable as it is unique. Every litigator should have this audiobook downloaded, no matter the state in which they practice. Read more

The closing arguments from ten noteworthy cases—“lawyers and nonlawyers will enjoy the passion and eloquence of these counselors; practitioners of law will find much to learn from them” (Los Angeles Times Book Review).Until now, only the twelve jurors who sat in judgment were able to appreciate these virtuoso performances, where weeks of testimony were boiled down and presented with flair, wit, and high drama. For five years the authors researched every archive, and readers can now lose themselves in the summations of America’s finest litigators. Clarence Darrow saves Leopold and Loeb from the gallows in the Roaring Twenties. Gerry Spence takes on the nuclear power industry for the death of Karen Silkwood in a modern-day David and Goliath struggle. Vincent Bugliosi squares off against the madness of Charles Manson and his murderous “family” in the aftermath of their bloody spree. Clara Foltz, the first woman to practice law in California, argues passionately to an all-male jury, defending her place in the courtroom. Bobby DeLaughter brings the killer of civil-rights leader Medgar Evers to justice after thirty years and two mistrials. Aubrey Daniel brings Lt. William Calley, Jr., to justice for the My Lai massacre. William Kunstler challenges the establishment after the 1968 Chicago riots in his defense of yippie leaders known as the Chicago Seven. Each closing argument is put into context by the authors, who provide historical background, a brief biography of each attorney, and commentary, pointing out the trial tactics used to great effect by the lawyers, all in accessible, reader-friendly language. Read more

None

This is the first book ever written for the defense on how to avoid runaway jury verdicts. I wrote this book because I care about fairness. I believe everyone has the right to a fair trial, not just plaintiff lawyers and their clients. Defendants are entitled to have a jury decide their case without being stirred with passion and bias by creative plaintiff lawyers.This is the defense "playbook" for justice. You will learn trial techniques to even the playing field for defendants seeking a fair trial. Every aspect of a civil jury trial will be covered, from voir dire to opening statements to witnesses and finally closing arguments. There is a formula for defeating plaintiff attorneys' deceptive tactics and psychological gamesmanship, and you will learn it.While full of 30 years of trial victories and personal experiences, this is a "how to" book. How to defend at trial. How to beat plaintiff attorneys at their own game. How to win. It is time to bring an end to the epidemic of nuclear verdicts across our country. It is time for you to take back justice for all!NUCLEAR VERDICTS MUST BE STOPPED! YOU CAN STOP THEM.RESPONSIBILITY. In every jury trial, accepting responsibility is not only the right thing to do, it is the most important thing you will do, no exceptions. Own what you did in every single jury trial, no excuses.REASONABLENESS. Be the most reasonable person in the courtroom. Do not take the typical defense approach of ­ fighting every little thing. Show the jury you care, and they will return a verdict that is fair and just for all.COMMON SENSE. The ultimate equalizer in any case is common sense. It allows the jury to come to a conclusion that is fair and reasonable. You must go beyond the evidence and the law, and help the jury apply their common sense for a righteous verdict. Read more

If you are an attorney (or student) who wants to succeed at trial, develop an ironclad case, dominate at cross examination, and craft world-class closing arguments, this in-depth, practical guide is for you! "I’ve never seen a law book like this before! This is like a behind the scenes look at the real thing. Step by step. Examples. Details. And even copies of his ACTUAL notes from a real trial. This is better than law school." – Amazon Review"This book should be REQUIRED reading in first year of law school; it should be REQUIRED reading for every litigation attorney who actually plans to try cases." – Amazon ReviewThis practical guide is designed to delve into the intricate details of trial advocacy, offering a comprehensive exploration from trial preparation to execution. Each chapter provides in-depth insights into every stage of the trial process, guiding attorneys through case analysis, strategy development, courtroom tactics, and effective advocacy.Following the success of his debut book, "How To Successfully Litigate A Personal Injury Case", is Andrew's second book of the Mentor Esq. Handbook Series, titled "Successful Trial Skills:Explore essential topics such as jury selection, opening statements, cross and direct examinations, and closing arguments in dedicated chapters. Whether you are a seasoned attorney or a novice seeking to refine your trial skills, "Successful Trial Skills" is your indispensable companion for mastering the art of trial advocacy."Extremely helpful practical guide for trying cases. The book contains meaningful explanations and great examples for succeeding at every phase of trial. I highly recommend this for anyone looking to level up." – Amazon Review Read more

The Purpose of a Common Law court Many people are plagued by the injustice of the courts, police, schools, banks, social services and the NHS. As citizens of a common law based judicial system, we have the right to come together in our local communities and convene a common law court in full lawful legitimacy. We are capable of judging and sentencing any person, business or organization fairly regardless of the status they hold in society. A court convened randomly by the public can be trusted to judge fairly with no alterior motives. Our sentences are enforced by local community members acting as peace officers who are sworn agents of the court directed by our court appointed sheriff. Read more

Juries have been delivering independent verdicts in the interest of justice for over 800 years, serving as the final check on government's power to pass unjust, immoral, or oppressive laws that leave citizens at the mercy of sometimes jaded or corrupt courts and legislatures. This was what the Founding Fathers feared, and this is the reason why they guaranteed trial by jury three times in the Constitution – more than any other right. In Jury Nullification, author Clay Conrad examines the history, the law, and the practical and political implications of jury independence, examining in depth the role of nullification in capital punishment law, the dark side of jury nullification in Southern lynching and civil rights cases, and the purpose and legal effect of the juror's oath. This book should be of interest to historians, trial lawyers, criminologists, political scientists, and anyone interested in knowing how our criminal justice system works – and how to make it better. Read more

None

None

This much anticipated and expanded 4th  edition by one of the nation's most experienced trial consultants goes beyond other books on jury selection and focuses on the skills needed to conduct effective voir dire and jury selection, ultimately improving your chances of a favorable verdict at trial. This valuable guide will help you understand effective voir dire and jury selection strategies and adapt them to the unique circumstances you face in your trial jurisdiction. Topics covered include:Understanding the importance of the jurors' backgrounds, experiences, and opinionsDeveloping voir dire questionsGood questioning techniques and skills that increase juror candor and honestyReading jurors' nonverbal behaviorTips for improving your success in group voir dire settingsSuccessfully overcoming common problems encountered during voir dire, including identifying and handling stealth jurorsHow to develop and use juror questionnaires effectivelyApplying effective voir dire skills and methods to member selection in courts-martialThe impact of the Internet on jury selection and jury trials Overall jury selection strategiesThis book is packed with updated practical advice, a new chapter on courts-martial, and supplemented with appendices, including examples of useful voir dire questions for civil and criminal cases. In addition, you will have access to an Internet catalogue of more than 190 juror questionnaires, including questionnaires from Colorado v. James Eagan Holmes, In re Exxon Valdez, i4i LP v. Microsoft Corporation, David Mueller v. Taylor Swift et al., United States v. Zacarious Moussaoui, California v. Scott Peterson, United States v. MAJ Nidal Hasan,and United States v. Senator Robert Menendez and Salomon Melgen, among many others. Read more

The night before the second Carroll - Trump trial it was colder in Iowa than in New York. Still, the first snow in 700 days drifted down on Worth Street in front of the courthouse, where the NYPD barricades had already been set up. The circus was about to begin. And Kurt Wheelock began to get ready. Well before the 9:30 am kickoff Trump was at the defense table, whispering with Alina Habba all dressed in white. There was a third lawyer, not in the docket, and Judge Kaplan would soon shut him down. But for now it was a stand-off: E. Jean Carroll with Robbie Kaplan at the front table, E. Jean staring straight ahead, and Trump in his red tie two table behind, looking at the prospective jurors when they came in. The voir dire was proceeding routinely until Judge Kaplan asked, Does anyone here think the 2020 election was stolen? Yes, said one...At the end, did Ms. Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that 1. Ms. Carroll suffered more than nominal damages as a result of Mr. Trump’s publication of the June 21 and June 22, 2019 statements? Answer Yes.Andy (clerk): 7.3 million... 11 million... punitives: $65 millionJudge Kaplan: Any other business?Ms. Habba: I would just like to thank the court staff JudgeKaplan: You're welcome on their behalf. Adjourned Kurt Wheelock, still banned from the UN, was asked to comment on that day's International Court of Justice decision Kurt mused about how the two proceedings were similar... Kurt would go from the trial to the trail. Read more

An important statistical study of the dynamics of jury selection and deliberation that offers a realistic jury simulation model, a statistical analysis of the personal characteristics of jurors and a general assessment of jury performance based on research findings by reputed scholars in the behavioral sciences. "A landmark jury study." --Contemporary Sociology "The book will stand as the third great product of social research into jury operations, ranking with Kalven and Zeisel's The American Jury and Van Dyke's Jury Selection Procedures." --American Bar Association Journal REID HASTIE has taught at Harvard University, Northwestern University and the University of Colorado (where he was Director of the Center for Research on Judgment and Policy). He is now a Professor of Behavioral Science on the faculty of the Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business and a member of the Center for Decision Research. He has published over 100 articles on topics including judgment and decision making, memory and cognition and social psychology. Hastie is widely recognized for his books on legal decision making: Social Psychology in Court (with Michael Saks, 1978), Inside the Juror (1993) and Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide (2002). STEVEN D. PENROD was a legal officer in the Naval Judge Advocate General Corps from 1971-1973. He was a professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin, University of Minnesota and the University of Nebraska. He is currently a Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY. He is the author of Social Psychology (1983). NANCY PENNINGTON, professor of psychology at the University of Colorado, Boulder, is acknowledged for her many publications which include Causal Reasoning and Decision Making: The Case of Juror Decisions (1981). Read more

SENIOR FEMALE EXECUTIVE ACCUSED OF MURDERING CO-WORKER DURING CRUISEA man is found dead in his stateroom at the end of a cruise debarking at the Miami port. The victim’s archrival at work is accused of killing him. Enter Attorney Sarah Reuben who represents yet another girlfriend accused of murder. In this “Who-did-it” novel of suspense and courtroom drama, Sarah must unravel the intricacies of high tech computer platform companies, bidding on State of Arizona data contracts, and most importantly, bribes. The victim can be labelled “Evil Eric” as he is a serial adulterer and always scheming to make money at someone else’s expense.Enjoy our irrepressible protagonist, at work and at play. Read more

None

For better or worse The People vs. O.J. Simpson served as a mirror of modern America. It was all there - wealth, fame, celebrity, sex, race, adultery, drugs, domestic abuse, and murder - acted out by a cast that cut across all segments of society in a drama that polarized the nation. And to witness it, all anyone had to do was turn on the television.As winter turned to spring and spring to summer, opinions formed and then hardened. Research polls reported deep divisions along racial lines and the opininon pages filled with commentary that tried to explain how so many could look at the same evidence and reach such starkly different conclusions. But what people saw in the trial of the century simply reflected their own backgrounds and beliefs. In the end, that was the most revealing verdict of all.Capturing the experiences of the jurors who decided this trial was not an easy feat. Throughout this book the insight and opinions of the primary narrators, Juror #230, foreperson Armanda Cooley; Juror # 98, Carrie Bess; and Juror #984, Marsha Rubin-Jackson, are expressed in their own words. Only they can, and do, reveal the view from the jury box."Phoenix Books is pleased to offer Madam Foreman in newly created ebook format which has been digitally enhanced to include a fully linked table of contents to ensure an enjoyable reading experience on all portable devices. Read more

Learn the easy system for giving emotionally-powerful closing arguments without using a single note. This is a practitioner's how-to guide, written for quick absorption and immediate use. It is aimed at practicing trial lawyers who handle civil, criminal and administrative proceedings. As such Garrity's book is short - fifty pages in the print edition - and gets right to the point, explaining the four prongs of the technique, citing the psychological studies showing why they work, and explaining how to easily implement his system. Garrity observed, after appearing as counsel in nearly 2,000 federal and state court cases, that many trial lawyers step to the podium for closing arguments with nothing more than a legal pad full of hastily-written, disjointed notes. The result is that these lawyers often make final arguments without a cohesive theme. Sometimes the arguments seem out of order, lack emotion and force, and simply rehash basic facts. Concluding that there had to be an easier – and better – way to make powerful summations, Garrity spent two years reviewing hardcore psychological research on the science of “compliance” – of persuading others to accept a particular statement or argument as true. After all, closing arguments are the ultimate effort in message persuasion. The research led Garrity to conclude that when it comes to closing arguments specifically, it's not the message that matters most. It's how you present it - your "messaging mechanics." He stresses that the jury has already heard your evidence - much of it twice because of the penchant of most litigators to repeat things to make sure the jury “gets it.” So closing is the time to persuade the jury to believe – to believe you, and to believe your message. His simple, note-free system emphasizes pathos (or passion as Aristotle defined it), eye contact, rhetoric and metaphors. This is the PERM system. Garrity’s technique combines these four compliance elements – supported by the more than forty research studies he lists in the opening pages – to offer you a transformational approach to closing arguments. How do jurors react? One juror told Garrity after a trial that it was "...one of the most moving experiences I have ever been through...I was....honored and humbled to be part of it…very powerful, very moving…It was your belief in the righteousness of the situation.” Read more

Cameron Todd Willingham refused to walk to his own execution. He was innocent, he insisted, and so the guards on the Texas Death Row carried him to his death. He died for the crime of arson, for killing his own three young children in the flames. The Skeptical Juror examines the crime and the trial through transcripts and court documents, and presents a fictionalized view into what a jury deliberation in such a sensational crime might have been like. Then, in the aftermath section, an examination of new discoveries in arson-investigation science show that Willingham may have been innocent. He may be the first conclusively demonstrated innocent person to be executed in America. Read more

On June 21, 2007, Thomas E. Toolan III was convicted of first-degree murder and of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon for the October 25, 2004 killing of Elizabeth "Beth" Lochtefeld in her rented cottage on the island of Nantucket, Massachusetts. It was the first homicide in Nantucket in twenty-one years. Media covering the trial included ABC's internet services division, CBS' 48 Hours, NBC's Dateline, NPR, People Magazine, the New York Post, The Nantucket Inqurer And Mirror, The Nantucket Independent, and The Cape Cod Times. The author attended the nearly three-week trial from the beginning of opening statements, and this is his account of the day-to-day proceedings. Read more